Caliber Node

Compute · 1 record · JSON

Caliber Node Compute

paidemail?card?Rvolume-quota

lowendtalk.com/discussion/221603/caliber-node-10-year-cloud- · cloud VM · compute/caliber-node · JSON · compare

Free tier	USD 10/year for the Micro plan: 1 shared vCPU on an Intel Xeon Gold, 1 GB DDR4, 15 GB SSD, in Dallas, Nuremberg or Singapore, with a 250-app one-click catalogue, automatic HTTPS and custom domains, per-app CIDR allow-listing, one-click app updates, transactional email with SPF and DKIM, snapshots on a daily or weekly schedule, health-check monitoring with email alerts, and a container terminal, SFTP and app logs. The app count is limited only by the resources. A separate option puts the same panel on the customer's own server. This is app hosting and not a VPS: the thread says so directly. unit GiB; metered on wall-clock; none
Price	none stated
Per-object cap	not applicable
Retention	not applicable
Egress	not stated: no monthly transfer figure, no port speed and no overage term appear in the thread
Identity	email (placeholder) not stated
Limits	volume-quota no bandwidth figure appears anywhere in the thread, so the only numbered ceilings are the 1 GB of RAM, 15 GB of SSD and 1 shared vCPU that the plan caps. Nothing about traffic is established, and the field is named volume-quota only because the resource quota is the limit that exists; a reader should treat the transfer allowance as unverified rather than absent. source no bandwidth figure appears anywhere in the thread, so the only numbered ceilings are the 1 GB of RAM, 15 GB of SSD and 1 shared vCPU that the plan caps. Nothing about traffic is established, and the field is named volume-quota only because the resource quota is the limit that exists; a reader should treat the transfer allowance as unverified rather than absent.
Binding	volume-quota no bandwidth figure appears anywhere in the thread, so the only numbered ceilings are the 1 GB of RAM, 15 GB of SSD and 1 shared vCPU that the plan caps. Nothing about traffic is established, and the field is named volume-quota only because the resource quota is the limit that exists; a reader should treat the transfer allowance as unverified rather than absent.
Interface	rest, cli inferred from the tooling the provider documents; not probed
Tooling	a panel with a container terminal, SFTP, app logs, per-app CIDR firewall rules, scheduled snapshots and health-check alerts; no API or CLI is documented on the page read
Composes with	USD 10 a year is USD 0.83/month for 1 GB of RAM and 15 GB of disk on a container platform with automatic HTTPS, which is the cheapest way to put a hosted application and its certificate online without administering a machine the missing transfer figure is the whole risk, since an app that serves bytes could hit a cap nobody has published
Reliability	no reliability event recorded
Notes	Not in dossier/compute (searched: caliber, no record). Recorded from the forum thread alone with no vendor page: the thread links no provider site, the offer index links only the thread, and does not guess a domain. That is why confidence is reported and the binding note says what is unverified. would-settle: the vendor domain, the transfer allowance, and whether the Bring Your Own Server option is priced separately, since the thread describes it without a figure.
Evidence rung	reported
Checked	2026-10-22 (live); stale on 2026-11-05
Parsed numbers	`$.limits[0].value` limit:volume-quota 1.0 GB

Evidence (2)

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-22	lowendtalk.com/discussion/221603/caliber-node-10-year-cloud-	the offer thread, posted September 29, 2026, quoted from its table: 'Plan Micro', 'CPU 1 shared vCPU - Intel Xeon Gold', 'RAM 1 GB DDR4', 'Storage 15 GB SSD', 'App catalog 250+ one-click apps', 'App limit As many as your resources can handle', 'Location Dallas, USA - Nuremberg, Germany - Singapore'; body text: 'Managed Cloud Apps - $10/year'; 'Our managed hosting is an app hosting service, not a VPS'
2026-10-22	lowendtalk.com/	the thread carries no vendor URL in its body, and the only provider site reachable from the offer index entry is the LowEndTalk thread itself: did not establish a vendor domain for Caliber Node and did not guess one

More fields (1)

{
 "wave2": {
  "class": null,
  "free_tier_kind": "none",
  "shape": {
   "vcpu": 1,
   "ram_gib": 1,
   "disk_gib": 15,
   "gpu_class": null,
   "gpu_count": null
  }
 }
}

Unknown or withheld values (8)

$.egress.metered egress-unknown
$.identity_cost.detail not-stated
$.identity_cost.kind identity-defaulted
$.per_object_cap.notes process
$.per_object_cap.stated not-applicable
$.reliability_note none-observed
$.retention.notes process
$.retention.stated not-applicable