cloud.mu

cloud.mu · Compute · 1 record · JSON

cloud.mu Compute

paidemail?card?Dvolume-quota

cloud.mu/linux-virtual-servers/ · cloud VM · compute/cloud-mu · JSON · compare

Free tier	Rs279/month for 1 CPU vCore, 1 GB, 32 GB SSD, 500 GB/month bandwidth, printed as 'Rs299 Rs279' with the first figure struck through. Second row Rs549 (from Rs569) for 1 vCore, 2 GB, 64 GB SSD, 700 GB/month. From the third row the bandwidth column reads 'Unmetered': Rs819 for 2 vCores, 3 GB, 128 GB SSD; Rs1,369 for 4 vCores, 6 GB, 256 GB; Rs3,279 for 8 vCores, 16 GB, 512 GB; Rs8,189 for 16 vCores, 64 GB, 1,024 GB. All servers in Mauritius, all limited to a 100 Mbps port. unit GiB; metered on wall-clock; none
Price	none stated
Per-object cap	not applicable
Retention	not applicable
Egress	500 GB/month on the entry plan and 700 GB/month on the second; every plan from 3 GB of RAM upward prints 'Unmetered', subject to the FAQ's port-speed clause and a 100 Mbps port on all servers free_allowance: 500 GB per month on the entry plan
Identity	email (placeholder) not stated
Limits	volume-quota 500 GB a month on the entry plan is the first wall, and it is the tightest transfer allowance. The FAQ states no overage price and no suspension rule, only that abuse may lead to a port-speed limit, so what happens at 500 GB is unverified. Every plan also sits behind a 100 Mbps port, so throughput caps the 'Unmetered' rows before the word means much. source 500 GB a month on the entry plan is the first wall, and it is the tightest transfer allowance. The FAQ states no overage price and no suspension rule, only that abuse may lead to a port-speed limit, so what happens at 500 GB is unverified. Every plan also sits behind a 100 Mbps port, so throughput caps the 'Unmetered' rows before the word means much.
Binding	volume-quota 500 GB a month on the entry plan is the first wall, and it is the tightest transfer allowance. The FAQ states no overage price and no suspension rule, only that abuse may lead to a port-speed limit, so what happens at 500 GB is unverified. Every plan also sits behind a 100 Mbps port, so throughput caps the 'Unmetered' rows before the word means much.
Interface	rest inferred from the tooling the provider documents; not probed
Tooling	KVM is stated in the FAQ ('As we use KVM to power our virtual hosting platform'), full admin/root access is stated on the homepage, and the buy links go to a WHMCS store at my.cloud.mu. No API appears on the page read
Composes with	Rs279 a month for 1 GB and 32 GB of SSD in Mauritius is the only host with a footprint in the Indian Ocean, which makes it a low-latency front end for an audience there 500 GB of transfer and a 100 Mbps port on every plan make it a small-site and control-plane host rather than a mover
Reliability	no reliability event recorded
Notes	The tracker generated no page for this provider, so the record is single-sourced from the vendor: an HTTP 404 'Provider not found' is a coverage gap in the third-party list, not a dead provider, and the vendor site answered with a live price table on the same date. The page prints 'Rs' with no ISO currency code; the site is the Mauritius-facing one on a .mu domain and no conversion is done here. One row is internally inconsistent: '\| 6 CPU vCores \| 8 GB \| 384 GB SSD \| Unmetered \| Rs1,900 Rs1,909 \|' prints a struck figure below the current one, which reads as a bad edit rather than a discount. The homepage states 'Billed monthly or annually with discounts', so Rs279 is the monthly-term price and the annual rate is not printed. Not in dossier/compute (searched: cloud.mu and cloud-mu, no record). would-settle: the annual price behind the Rs279, and whether 'Unmetered' is enforceable at 100 Mbps without a fair-use throttle.
Evidence rung	documented
Checked	2026-10-22 (live); stale on 2026-11-21
Parsed numbers	`$.limits[0].value` limit:volume-quota 500.0 GB / month

Evidence (4)

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-22	vpspricetracker.com/provider/cloud.mu/vps	wall, quoted from the returned document: 'HTTP 404 - Provider not found.' The tracker has no page for this provider under that name, so the tracker step of the method could not run and every figure here comes from the vendor.
2026-10-22	cloud.mu/linux-virtual-servers/	table header '\| CPU \| Memory \| Storage \| Bandwidth \| Price/month \|' and first row '\| 1 CPU vCore \| 1 GB \| 32 GB SSD \| 500 GB/Month \| Rs299 Rs279 \|', second row '\| 1 CPU vCore \| 2 GB \| 64 GB SSD \| 700 GB/Month \| Rs569 Rs549 \|'
2026-10-22	cloud.mu/linux-virtual-servers/	rows three and up carry 'Unmetered' in the bandwidth column: '\| 2 CPU vCores \| 3 GB \| 128 GB SSD \| Unmetered \| Rs839 Rs819 \|', '\| 4 CPU vCores \| 6 GB \| 256 GB SSD \| Unmetered \| Rs1,399 Rs1,369 \|', '\| 8 CPU vCores \| 16 GB \| 512 GB SSD \| Unmetered \| Rs3,299 Rs3,279 \|', '\| 16 CPU vCores \| 64 GB \| 1024 GB SSD \| Unmetered \| Rs8,299 Rs8,189 \|'
2026-10-22	cloud.mu/linux-virtual-servers/	FAQ, quoted: 'We do not limit the amount of traffic to and from your Virtual Server. You could use 1GB or 10TB - but if we suspect abuse, we may be in touch or limit your port speed. Play fair! All servers are limited to 100Mbps port speed.'

More fields (1)

{
 "wave2": {
  "class": null,
  "free_tier_kind": "none",
  "shape": {
   "vcpu": 1,
   "ram_gib": 1,
   "disk_gib": 32,
   "gpu_class": null,
   "gpu_count": null
  }
 }
}

Unknown or withheld values (7)

$.identity_cost.detail not-stated
$.identity_cost.kind identity-defaulted
$.per_object_cap.notes process
$.per_object_cap.stated not-applicable
$.reliability_note none-observed
$.retention.notes process
$.retention.stated not-applicable