Feige
fgnwct.com · Egress and tunnels · 1 record · JSON
Feige (fgnwct) Egress and tunnels
fails: quotaemailno cardphoneDper-ip-shaping
| Free tier | Free: 0 yuan, speed 0.5 Mbps, 20 concurrent connections, free domain, custom domain allowed, 2 TCP/UDP port numbers, unlimited traffic, daily check-in stacks duration. [translated] unit unlimited; metered on none |
|---|---|
| Price | USD 0 |
| Per-object cap | not applicable |
| Retention | not applicable |
| Egress | Traffic is stated as unlimited on the free plan, with no byte counter named anywhere. The binding number is the speed: 0.5 Mbps sustained for 30 days is about 162 GB, so the plan cannot reach 1 TiB/month even at line rate.; ingress: udp free_allowance: none published |
| Identity | email The registration form asks for username, email, emailed verification code and password. No mobile number field and no real-name step appear on it. |
| Limits | |
| Binding | per-ip-shaping 0.5 Mbps is 5.27 GB/day at line rate, about 162 GB over 30 days, against the 3.24 Mbps that 1 TiB/month needs. Unlimited traffic is true and useless at this speed. |
| Interface | cli Windows, Linux, macOS and Android clients; http(s) domain proxying plus TCP and UDP port forwarding. |
| Tooling | vendor client (3.5 MB, unpack and run) plus wg-quick on the local box |
| Composes with | Two fixed UDP ports at 0.5 Mbps is enough for a WG control channel and a trickle, not for bulk transfer; pair it with a metered free VM for the volume. |
| Reliability | Daily check-in adds time to the free mapping rather than traffic, so a free tunnel can expire; the vendor states it is a small operation with no guaranteed support. |
| Notes | The only provider that pairs UDP ingress with email-only registration, so it is the cheapest to test of the Chinese set. Whether the two TCP/UDP ports are fixed for the life of the mapping is not stated on the pages read. A licensed operator: the footer carries a value-added telecom licence and a domestic VPN service licence. |
| Evidence rung | documented Plan table and registration form both read first-party today. What would raise the rung is a probe measuring whether the 0.5 Mbps is per tunnel or per account, and whether the two assigned ports survive a reconnect. |
| Checked | 2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-22 |
| Parsed numbers |
|
Evidence (3)
| date | source | what it proved |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-23 | www.fgnwct.com/price.html | free plan is 0 yuan, 0.5 Mbps, 20 concurrent, 2 TCP/UDP ports, unlimited traffic |
| 2026-10-23 | www.fgnwct.com/ | the service carries http(s) domain proxying plus TCP and UDP port forwarding |
| 2026-10-23 | www.fgnwct.com/register.html | registration is username, email, emailed code, password |
More fields (7)
{
"wg_path": "inside-udp",
"wg_detail": "The site describes a UDP proxy mode for reaching internal machines over UDP, and the free plan includes two TCP/UDP port numbers, so a WG datagram addressed to one of those public UDP ports reaches the local listener. No WG config is issued.",
"ingress": "udp",
"volume_tib_month": null,
"volume_stated": "Traffic is stated as unlimited on the free plan, with no byte counter named anywhere. The binding number is the speed: 0.5 Mbps sustained for 30 days is about 162 GB, so the plan cannot reach 1 TiB/month even at line rate.",
"bytes_transit": "yes",
"transit_note": "Vendor relays on Alibaba Cloud, Tencent Cloud and older domestic datacentres."
}Unknown or withheld values (2)
$.per_object_cap.statednot-applicable$.retention.statednot-applicable