fshy

fshy / Egress and tunnels

usque

github.com · Egress and tunnels · 1 record · JSON

usque Egress and tunnels

caveatanonymousno cardD

github.com/Diniboy1123/usque · tool (wireguard transport) · egress/usque · JSON · compare

Free tierno service and no account; "an open-source reimplementation of the Cloudflare WARP client's MASQUE mode"
unit none; metered on none
PriceUSD 0
Per-object capnot applicable
Retentionnot applicable
Egressnot stated by this tool; the traffic reaches Cloudflare WARP; ingress: none
free_allowance: none published
Identityanonymous no account; registration is performed by the tool
Bindingnone it adds no quota; its value is that it reaches WARP over TCP or HTTP/2 where WireGuard over UDP fails
Interfacecli usque register / enroll / native-tun / socks5 / http-proxy / l4-proxy / port-forward
Toolingsingle Go binary; SOCKS5, HTTP, native TUN and port-forward modes
Composes withcomposes with any free compute host that blocks WireGuard but allows QUIC or TCP 443, and with the cloudflare-warp record.
Reliabilitythe README says only the Linux amd64 binary was tested; userspace QUIC is slower than kernel WireGuard by the author's own statement
NotesThe only client that replaces the UDP transport without a second host: it speaks MASQUE over TCP or HTTP/2 to Cloudflare's own edge, so there is no wrapper at the far end. That makes it the one answer to a UDP block that needs nothing but the device. It is also the honest no for the router question, since no .conf exists. Port forward mode is documented, which is the closest it comes to ingress.
Evidence rungdocumented a probe through the native tunnel or the SOCKS5 mode would raise it
Checked2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-22
Parsed numbers
  • $.price_per_tb_month price-per-tb USD0.0 TB / month
Evidence (4)
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-23github.com/Diniboy1123/usque"leverages the Connect-IP (RFC 9484) protocol" with native tunnel, SOCKS5, HTTP and L4 proxy modes
2026-10-23github.com/Diniboy1123/usque"reports that WARP+ doesn't work anymore over WireGuard arose lately" citing wgcf issue 459, and "certain networks block WireGuard, but don't block QUIC"
2026-10-23github.com/Diniboy1123/usquerelease v4.2.1 published 2026-07-20; last push 2026-07-20; 1493 stars
2026-10-23github.com/Diniboy1123/usque"MASQUE is userspace, and so is QUIC, the underlying protocol, making the implementation slower"
More fields (10)
{
 "wg_path": "registration-api",
 "wg_detail": "it registers its own WARP device and then carries traffic over MASQUE (Connect-IP, RFC 9484) instead of WireGuard, so there is no .conf and no UDP",
 "ingress": "none",
 "volume_tib_month": null,
 "volume_stated": "not stated by this tool; the traffic reaches Cloudflare WARP",
 "bytes_transit": "yes",
 "transit_note": "through Cloudflare's MASQUE endpoint",
 "hosting_requirement": "none; runs on the device and dials Cloudflare's edge",
 "last_release": "v4.2.1 2026-07-20",
 "stars": 1493
}
Unknown or withheld values (3)
  • $.egress.metered egress-unknown
  • $.per_object_cap.stated not-applicable
  • $.retention.stated not-applicable