fshy

fshy / Debrid

Linksave

linksave.in · Debrid · 1 record · JSON

Linksave (linksave.in / linkcrypt.ws) Debrid

deadanonymousno cardM

linksave.in/ · link container / link protector (dead) · debrid/linksave · JSON · compare

Free tierHistorical: a free link protector whose API took a username and password and returned a folder URL. 'URL: http://linksave.in/protect?api=[username]:[Password]' with fields for links, mirrors, captcha on/off and container types rsdf/ccf/dlc. Nothing of the service answers today.
unit none; metered on none; The 2011 API description is third-party. No current page on the domain exists to confirm or price anything.
Pricenone stated
Per-object capnot applicable: it held links, not bytes.
Retentionunknown and now moot: the service is unreachable, so nothing is retained.
Egressnone: dead.
free_allowance: none
Identityanonymous Historical API used a username:password pair embedded in the URL; whether registration was open is not verifiable now.
Limits
  • request-rate no service: the wildcard host ww17.linksave.in fails name resolution
The 302 target is the same wildcard pattern that linkcrypt.ws now uses, which suggests one operator or one parking setup for both domains.
Bindingnone Nothing binds because nothing answers: at any volume the first failure is DNS.
Interfacerest Historical HTTP API only: POST to /protect?api=user:pass with *save, *links and optional container/captcha fields. Today the domain issues a 302 to a wildcard host that does not resolve in DNS.
ToolingJDownloader used to ship a linksave decrypter plugin. Nothing to drive now.
Composes withnone: a dead container service removes an indirection layer, it does not add one.
ReliabilityDead as of today: 302 to ww17.linksave.in, then getaddrinfo failure (errno 11004). The broker also returned 504 on the plain read. Last known live capture is the Wayback snapshot of 2025-05-24, HTTP 200.
Noteslinkcrypt.ws is the same case and is recorded here rather than as a second file: both 302 to the identical ww17.<domain> wildcard and both fail DNS. The brief names both; one dead service with two domains is one fact.
Evidence rungmeasured The death is measured twice (probe redirect + DNS failure, broker 504). The description of what it was rests on a 2011 forum post and the archive capture, and is marked reported.
Checked2026-10-24 (live); stale on 2026-11-23
Evidence (4)
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-23probe:https://linksave.in/HTTP 302 to https://ww17.linksave.in/, then 'getaddrinfo failed' errno 11004; 0 bytes; no hash
2026-10-23probe:https://linkcrypt.ws/the sibling domain fails identically: 302 to https://ww17.linkcrypt.ws/, then DNS failure
2026-10-23web.archive.org/web/20250524063944/http://linksave.in/Wayback capture 2025-05-24 06:39:44 of the root: HTTP 200, text/html, 1122 bytes recorded
2026-10-23www.autoitscript.com/forum/topic/129784-help-using-winhttp-treported, 2011: the protect API signature and the rsdf/ccf/dlc container options
More fields (2)
{
 "sibling_domain": "linkcrypt.ws (302 to ww17.linkcrypt.ws, DNS failure)",
 "last_live_capture": "2025-05-24T06:39:44Z (Wayback, HTTP 200)"
}