fshy

fshy / Egress and tunnels

VmShell Hong Kong CMI port forward

logovps.com · Egress and tunnels · 1 record · JSON

VmShell Hong Kong CMI port forward Egress and tunnels

trialemailno cardRretention-clamped

www.logovps.com/1180.html · tcp port forward (hosted, Hong Kong) · egress/vmshell-hk-port-forward · JSON · compare

Free tier[translated] 'Free Hong Kong CMI three-network direct port forwarding: CMI port-forwarding test notice, free for one month. allowed port numbers 13800-59999. Limit: one product per ID.'
unit hours; metered on wall-clock
PriceUSD 0 for one month
Per-object capnot applicable
Retentionnot applicable
Egress[translated] 'Free for one month', with no traffic allowance, rate or session length stated. The notice describes it as a test product with no technical support.; ingress: tcp
free_allowance: none published
Identityemail [translated] 'Limit: one product per ID', ordered through a vmshell.com cart link. The notice does not state what registration requires.
Limits
  • retention-clamped [translated] 'free for one month' source
Bindingretention-clamped The month ends before 1 TiB/month can be reached, and the notice publishes no byte allowance to fail first.
Interfaceunknown [translated] The notice gives a vmshell.com cart link and a Telegram support group; no client or API is described.
Toolingpanel-configured port forward; no client documented in the notice
Composes withA Hong Kong forward on a high port would front a service that speaks on 13800-59999, for one month.
ReliabilityDescribed by the vendor as a test product with no technical support; the blocked port list removes 22, 80, 443 and 3306.
NotesA free Hong Kong port forward on China Telecom's CMI route, which is the shape that matters for a Hong Kong address a mainland-facing service will accept. It is a one-month test product announced in January 2023 with no support. The admin ports 22, 443, 80 and 3306 are blocked, so it can never host SSH or TLS on the usual ports. Country: Hong Kong. Whether UDP exists in the allowed range is the one question that would change the verdict and the notice does not answer it.
Evidence rungreported A third-party blog reproducing the vendor's Telegram notice dated 2023-01-23. The vendor page was not read and the notice is three years old, so whether the trial still runs is not established. Reading vmshell.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=76 would settle it.
Checked2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-06
Parsed numbers
  • $.price_per_tb_month price-per-tb USD0.0 TB / month
Evidence (1)
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-23www.logovps.com/1180.htmlallowed port numbers 13800-59999', 'Limit: one product per ID'.
More fields (7)
{
 "wg_path": "unknown",
 "wg_detail": "[translated] The notice names a port range (13800-59999) and no protocol. A TCP-only forward could not carry a WireGuard datagram; whether UDP is forwarded in that range is not stated by the notice.",
 "ingress": "tcp",
 "volume_tib_month": null,
 "volume_stated": "[translated] 'Free for one month', with no traffic allowance, rate or session length stated. The notice describes it as a test product with no technical support.",
 "bytes_transit": "yes",
 "transit_note": "VmShell's Hong Kong CMI address forwards for a user's machine."
}
Unknown or withheld values (3)
  • $.interface interface-unknown
  • $.per_object_cap.stated not-applicable
  • $.retention.stated not-applicable