Perfect Privacy
perfect-privacy.com · Egress and tunnels · 1 record · JSON
Perfect Privacy Egress and tunnels
paidemail?card?Rretention-clamped
| Free tier | No free tier. Order page as indexed 2026-10-23: 1 month $12.99 or 12.99 EUR per month; 1 year 119.99 EUR; 2 years 214.95 EUR; 3 months 35.95 EUR; 6 months 65.95 EUR. unit none; metered on none |
|---|---|
| Price | unverified live; indexed order page shows USD 12.99 per month and EUR 119.99 per year |
| Per-object cap | not applicable |
| Retention | not applicable |
| Egress | unverified: no page read states a Perfect Privacy traffic allowance. ingress: tcp+udp free_allowance: none published |
| Identity | email (placeholder) unverified beyond the order flow: a plan is selected and paid for before use; the payment and registration fields were not read because every perfect-privacy.com path returned a broker 530. |
| Limits |
|
| Binding | retention-clamped The 7-day expiry is the failure that arrives first, and it is the mildest version of the lease in this set because the vendor offers automatic renewal, which preserves the port number rather than reissuing one. |
| Interface | cli Vendor client and web dashboard; no API read. |
| Tooling | Vendor VPN Manager; port configuration in the client dashboard per the manual. |
| Composes with | If the 7-day expiry with auto-renew holds, this is one of the few paid options where a stable port is the default rather than an add-on. |
| Reliability | unverified: the vendor site could not be reached through any read path, so no reliability claim about the live service is made. |
| Notes | Three candidates for the consistent 530 on every perfect-privacy.com path: (1) the site blocks the broker's egress, since a 2025-08 archive capture renders the same page normally and a 2026-06 third-party page describes the service as operating; (2) the service shut down in 2026, which one review aggregator asserts with the phrase no longer available since 2026; (3) the paths were wrong. The second is not refuted: the archive proves the site existed in 2025, not that it serves today, and the aggregator claim is a single third-party line. Against it, two independent 2026 pages describe the product as live and pricing as current. The honest position is that reachability is unestablished, not that the provider is dead, and a single successful read resolves it. |
| Evidence rung | reported Every direct read of perfect-privacy.com, across four paths and two hosts, returned a broker 530, so the forwarding, price and protocol facts are the vendor's own pages as indexed by the search provider rather than pages rendered. One vendor page was reached through a 2025-08-05 archive capture. A live read would raise this to documented and is the single cheapest improvement. |
| Checked | 2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-06 |
| Parsed numbers |
|
Evidence (4)
| date | source | what it proved |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-23 | www.perfect-privacy.com/en/manuals/windows_vpnmanager_doc | Default forwarding opens three ports; custom forwarding allows chosen ports; ports expire after seven days and can be auto-renewed with email notification. Reached through the search index only. |
| 2026-10-23 | www.perfect-privacy.com/en/software | Up to five specific ports plus three random ports; the same page as captured 2025-08-05 describes OpenVPN and IPsec tunnels and does not mention WireGuard. |
| 2026-10-23 | www.perfect-privacy.com/en/order | Plan prices from the indexed order page: 12.99, 9.99, 8.95 and 11.98 per month across the four terms. Not rendered live. |
| 2026-10-23 | board.perfect-privacy.com/threads/wireguard-support.3221/ | Vendor staff explain reluctance to WireGuard and say a test server is planned. Indexed text only; the direct read returned 530. |
More fields (7)
{
"wg_path": "unknown",
"wg_detail": "unverified. The vendor software page, read through an Internet Archive capture of 2025-08-05, describes only OpenVPN and IPsec tunnels: As soon as you have established an OpenVPN or IPsec connection. A vendor board thread answers a WireGuard request with we should have a Wireguard server available for public testing soon, and a 2026-07 third-party review states Perfect Privacy offers no support for WireGuard while a 2026-06 third-party page lists WireGuard as a protocol. The two third-party claims contradict each other and neither was checked against a live vendor page.",
"ingress": "tcp+udp",
"volume_tib_month": null,
"volume_stated": "unverified: no page read states a Perfect Privacy traffic allowance.",
"bytes_transit": "yes",
"transit_note": "unverified: the transit path was not observed."
}Unknown or withheld values (3)
$.identity_cost.kindidentity-defaulted$.per_object_cap.statednot-applicable$.retention.statednot-applicable