Tencent Cloud

tencent.com · Compute, Storage · 3 records · JSON

Tencent Cloud SCF Computecaveatemail?card?Drequest-rate
Tencent Cloud Agent Runtime - Agent Sandbox Computepaidemail?card?Drequest-rate
tencent cloud cos (腾讯云对象存储) Storagefails: egressemail?card?R

Tencent Cloud SCF Compute

caveatemail?card?Drequest-rate

cloud.tencent.com/document/product/583/17299 · cloud VM · compute/tencent-scf · JSON · compare

Free tier	a free quota exists for 云函数 (SCF), listed in the billing overview's own contents; its size is on the linked pricing page, which this record does not cite unit mixed; metered on request-count
Price	none stated
Per-object cap	not stated
Retention	not stated
Egress	not stated
Identity	email (placeholder) not published
Limits	request-rate SCF has a free quota, named in the billing overview's contents; its size is on the linked pricing page source write-gated log delivery to CLS is billed under CLS's own rules, and CLS grants new users a separate short-lived quota source per-object-cap other products reached from a function, such as CFS and COS, bill under their own rules source not stated
Binding	request-rate
Interface	unknown
Tooling	not stated
Composes with	not stated
Reliability	no reliability event recorded
Evidence rung	documented the billing overview was read on 2026-10-22 and its contents carry a 免费额度 section, which contradicts the record's paid-only verdict. The amount is not in the extracted body, so the record states that a free quota exists and does not give a number
Checked	2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-22

Evidence (2)

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-02	cloud.tencent.com/document/product/583/17299	not published
2026-10-22	cloud.tencent.com/document/product/583/17299	the billing overview was read on 2026-10-22 (Chinese) and its own table of contents lists '免费额度' - a free quota - alongside a pay-as-you-go mode; the amount itself is on the linked pricing page this record does not cite

More fields (14)

{
 "talaria_m10h_usd": 38.42,
 "talaria_m24h_usd": 89.65,
 "nemo_m10h_usd": null,
 "keep_rate": 1.0,
 "keep_rate_basis": null,
 "billing_model": "unclassified",
 "shape": null,
 "session_cap": {
  "wall_clock_min": null,
  "idle_reap_s": null,
  "restart_required": false,
  "note": "a function answers an invocation; there is no machine to keep alive"
 },
 "persistent_storage": null,
 "network_out": null,
 "price_note": null,
 "free_tier_kind": "allowance",
 "ps": null,
 "net": {
  "out": true,
  "in": true,
  "ports": "invocation and an API gateway",
  "static_ip": false,
  "ipv6": null,
  "allowance": null
 }
}

Unknown or withheld values (17)

$.chaining not-stated
$.egress.metered egress-unknown
$.egress.terms not-stated
$.evidence[0].proved process
$.extras.keep_rate_basis process
$.extras.price_note process
$.identity_cost.detail defaulted
$.identity_cost.kind identity-defaulted
$.interface interface-unknown
$.interface_detail withheld
$.limits_note not-stated
$.per_object_cap.notes process
$.per_object_cap.stated not-stated
$.reliability_note none-observed
$.retention.notes not-extracted
$.retention.stated not-stated
$.tooling not-stated

Tencent Cloud Agent Runtime - Agent Sandbox Compute

paidemail?card?Drequest-rate

cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1814/133249 · container and VM sandbox · compute/tencent-agent-runtime · JSON · compare

Free tier	no free tier: CPU bills at CNY 0.000081 a core-second from a successful start to a stop; a paused instance stops CPU and memory billing and pays only the storage its state needs unit none; metered on none
Price	none stated
Per-object cap	not stated
Retention	not stated
Egress	not stated
Identity	email (placeholder) not published
Limits	request-rate CNY 0.000081 a core-second, billed from a successful start to a stop source retention-clamped a paused instance stops CPU and memory billing and continues to pay for the storage its state needs; waking resumes compute billing source per-object-cap the document's own 30-day example for 1 core always-on is CNY 69.98, and for 2 cores CNY 419.90 source not stated
Binding	request-rate
Interface	unknown
Tooling	not stated
Composes with	not stated
Reliability	no reliability event recorded
Evidence rung	documented the billing document was read on 2026-10-22 (Chinese, updated 2026-10-10) and states the per-second CPU rate, the pause semantics and a 30-day worked example. There is no free tier, so the claim is contradicted and the verdict moves to paid-only
Checked	2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-22

Evidence (2)

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-02	cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1814/133249	not published
2026-10-22	cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1814/133249	'按实际运行时长及资源规格计费。实例启动成功后开始计费，停止后停止计费' - billed on actual runtime and spec, from a successful start to a stop - with 'CPU 0.000081 元 / 核 / 秒' and '暂停期间 CPU、内存停止计费，保留状态所需存储继续计费，唤醒后计算资源重新计费', quoted

More fields (16)

{
 "talaria_m10h_usd": 42.17,
 "talaria_m24h_usd": 101.2,
 "nemo_m10h_usd": 42.64,
 "keep_rate": 1.0,
 "keep_rate_basis": null,
 "billing_model": "unclassified",
 "shape": {
  "vcpu": 1,
  "ram": null,
  "disk": null,
  "gpu_class": null,
  "gpu_count": null,
  "note": "the document's worked example bills 1 core for 28,800 seconds a day at CNY 69.98 a month"
 },
 "session_cap": {
  "wall_clock_min": null,
  "idle_reap_s": null,
  "restart_required": false,
  "note": "no vendor reap: billing runs from start to stop, and pause keeps state for a storage charge"
 },
 "persistent_storage": null,
 "network_out": null,
 "price_note": null,
 "free_tier_kind": "none",
 "granularity": {
  "min_billed_s": 1,
  "rounding_s": null
 },
 "burst_x": 1.0,
 "ps": {
  "gib": null,
  "price": "state storage is billed while an instance is paused",
  "durability": "paused state kept on storage",
  "on_stop": true,
  "on_destroy": false,
  "retention": "while the state is kept"
 },
 "net": null
}

Unknown or withheld values (17)

$.chaining not-stated
$.egress.metered egress-unknown
$.egress.terms not-stated
$.evidence[0].proved process
$.extras.keep_rate_basis process
$.extras.price_note process
$.identity_cost.detail defaulted
$.identity_cost.kind identity-defaulted
$.interface interface-unknown
$.interface_detail withheld
$.limits_note not-stated
$.per_object_cap.notes process
$.per_object_cap.stated not-stated
$.reliability_note none-observed
$.retention.notes not-extracted
$.retention.stated not-stated
$.tooling not-stated

tencent cloud cos (腾讯云对象存储) Storage

fails: egressemail?card?R

cloud.tencent.com/document/product/436/50201 · rejected-provider · storage/tencent-cloud-cos · JSON · compare

Free tier	Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB unit none; metered on none
Price	none stated
Per-object cap	not recorded
Retention	not recorded
Egress	not recorded
Identity	email (placeholder) not published
Binding	none no constraint of a named kind was recorded; the verdict rests on the quota sentence rather than on a named limit
Interface	unknown
Tooling	not recorded
Composes with	not recorded
Reliability	Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB
Notes	Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB
Evidence rung	reported
Checked	2026-10-21 (inherited); stale on 2026-11-04

Evidence (3)

date	source	what it proved
2026-10-21	cloud.tencent.com/document/product/436/50201	Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB
2026-10-21	www.foreignserver.com/cos/txyshoufei.html	cited as the basis of the rejection: Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB
2026-10-21	buy.cloud.tencent.com/price/cos	cited as the basis of the rejection: Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB

More fields (1)

{
 "dead_end": {
  "failure_class": "egress",
  "why": "Storage is cheap, egress is the entire cost and it is the worst ratio in the set. Standard storage ¥0.118/GB/mo ($18.06/TB/mo) but outbound traffic ¥0.5/GB — that is ¥512/TB = $76.54 per TB",
  "retry_when": null,
  "first_recorded": "2026-10-21"
 }
}

Unknown or withheld values (15)

$.chaining not-recorded
$.confidence_note withheld
$.egress.terms not-recorded
$.extras.dead_end.retry_when process
$.free_tier.notes process
$.identity_cost.detail defaulted
$.identity_cost.kind identity-defaulted
$.interface interface-unknown
$.interface_detail withheld
$.limits_note process
$.per_object_cap.notes not-recorded
$.per_object_cap.stated not-recorded
$.retention.notes process
$.retention.stated not-recorded
$.tooling not-recorded