fshy

fshy / Egress and tunnels

VPSLog

vpslog.net · Egress and tunnels · 1 record · JSON

VPSLog Egress and tunnels

trialany-phoneno cardphoneU

distribute.vpslog.net · free nat vps · egress/vpslog · JSON · compare

Free tierA free NAT IPv4 VPS obtained through a Telegram bot; the panel shows the IPv4 address, an SSH port, and a port list behind a SHOW button. [translated]
unit unlimited; metered on unstated
PriceUSD 0
Per-object capnot applicable
Retentionnot applicable
EgressNo traffic figure is stated in the write-ups I read.; ingress: udp
free_allowance: none published
Identityany-phone A Telegram account is the only credential: log in through @vpslog_distribute_bot and receive a code.
Limits
  • request-rate a fixed list of assignable ports source
  • retention-clamped renewal required; interval not stated in what I read source
Bindingnone No byte cap is published, so nothing in the vocabulary fails at 1 TiB; the port list is the practical limit.
Interfacessh SSH to the shared IPv4 on the assigned port, plus a web panel.
Toolingssh, wg-quick
Composes withA zero-cost WG endpoint if the port list includes a UDP port and the service still issues machines.
ReliabilityShared IPv4 with a restricted port list; nothing about durability is documented.
NotesKept because it is the archetype of the Telegram-only free NAT VPS, and the write-up names the trap: a shared IPv4 where only a listed subset of ports is forwarded. Three-year-old evidence, so this is a lead to re-check, not a finding.
Evidence rungunverified Every source is from 2023 and the distribution endpoint was not opened today. The provider may no longer issue machines; that is the check to run first.
Checked2026-10-23 (live); stale on 2026-11-06
Parsed numbers
  • $.price_per_tb_month price-per-tb USD0.0 TB / month
Evidence (2)
datesourcewhat it proved
2026-10-23v2cross.com/4198.htmlTelegram-only signup, NAT IPv4 with a restricted port list, no traffic figure
2026-10-23www.nodeseek.com/post-6248-1the free NAT machines were handed out through a Telegram bot in 2023
More fields (7)
{
 "wg_path": "native-conf",
 "wg_detail": "Root on a NAT VPS with a published port list; WG would bind a listed port. The port list is the open question: only a subset of ports is usable.",
 "ingress": "udp",
 "volume_tib_month": null,
 "volume_stated": "No traffic figure is stated in the write-ups I read.",
 "bytes_transit": "yes",
 "transit_note": "Unverified."
}
Unknown or withheld values (2)
  • $.per_object_cap.stated not-applicable
  • $.retention.stated not-applicable